<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Blog&#8221; is not good enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artandperception.com/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html</link>
	<description>a multi-disciplinary dialog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-17215</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 15:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/v01/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-17215</guid>
		<description>Played with Lincoln Logs as a kid. How about Linkin' Blogs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Played with Lincoln Logs as a kid. How about Linkin&#8217; Blogs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: auspicious</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>auspicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/v01/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Karl:  I read this stream of comments after the 'parallel blogs' post.

I don't see auspiciousdragon.net as a stream of parallel journals but a single journal.  It is varied because our interests are varied.  The balance alters over time.  We are both generalists, not specialists, and always have been.

"Daybook" might be another appropriate name for what we do, as might the more pedestrian "diary".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl:  I read this stream of comments after the &#8216;parallel blogs&#8217; post.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see auspiciousdragon.net as a stream of parallel journals but a single journal.  It is varied because our interests are varied.  The balance alters over time.  We are both generalists, not specialists, and always have been.</p>
<p>&#8220;Daybook&#8221; might be another appropriate name for what we do, as might the more pedestrian &#8220;diary&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthur</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/v01/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-314</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Arthur, you just did.&lt;/I&gt;

Philosophers of language distinguish between the "use" of a term and its "mention". My typing the dreadful b word falls in the latter category. Its like the difference betwen calling you a piece of shit and pointing out that "shit" is a word in the English language.

On a a less pedantic note, blogs as rooms in houses seems to be a good direction.

Bookshelf seems better than book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Arthur, you just did.</i></p>
<p>Philosophers of language distinguish between the &#8220;use&#8221; of a term and its &#8220;mention&#8221;. My typing the dreadful b word falls in the latter category. Its like the difference betwen calling you a piece of shit and pointing out that &#8220;shit&#8221; is a word in the English language.</p>
<p>On a a less pedantic note, blogs as rooms in houses seems to be a good direction.</p>
<p>Bookshelf seems better than book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Zipser</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Zipser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/v01/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-313</guid>
		<description>You also said that blog posts (not to mention blog comments) are only of transient interest . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You also said that blog posts (not to mention blog comments) are only of transient interest . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Zipser</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Zipser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/v01/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Arthur, you just did.

Yes, I remember your living room comment. I guess you had more insight there than I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur, you just did.</p>
<p>Yes, I remember your living room comment. I guess you had more insight there than I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthur</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/v01/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-311</guid>
		<description>Oh, and the term "blogosphere" is horrible. I never use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the term &#8220;blogosphere&#8221; is horrible. I never use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthur</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/v01/2006/09/blog-is-not-good-enough.html#comment-310</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Arthur, it seems you are not very interested in architecture.&lt;/I&gt;

I think a group of rooms would work better as a metaphor than a stack of bricks. Wasn't it my suggesion that  a website is like a living room?

&lt;I&gt;perhaps you need to start writing parallel blogs yourself first.&lt;/I&gt;

I hope to start writing for a group blog very soon: http://ithacatimes.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Arthur, it seems you are not very interested in architecture.</i></p>
<p>I think a group of rooms would work better as a metaphor than a stack of bricks. Wasn&#8217;t it my suggesion that  a website is like a living room?</p>
<p><i>perhaps you need to start writing parallel blogs yourself first.</i></p>
<p>I hope to start writing for a group blog very soon: <a href="http://ithacatimes.wordpress.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/ithacatimes.wordpress.com');" rel="nofollow">http://ithacatimes.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
