<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critique Me!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html</link>
	<description>a multi-disciplinary dialog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wolfbaby</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfbaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 03:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>I do not know all of the technical terms and stuff for art but I know what I like and I love the colors in this.  The detail is awesome!!! I love how you did the light on the glass and the table cloth!!! I feel like I could step into this picture...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not know all of the technical terms and stuff for art but I know what I like and I love the colors in this.  The detail is awesome!!! I love how you did the light on the glass and the table cloth!!! I feel like I could step into this picture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Shanks</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Shanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>First of all, this is really lovely. The light on the glass and the grapes is amazing. Having looked at the first critique, I agree that the fold in the cloth was distracting, but now it's not clear what's happening with the table in the foreground. Are we seeing the table edge? or an expanse of table cloth? The painting seems ambiguous here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, this is really lovely. The light on the glass and the grapes is amazing. Having looked at the first critique, I agree that the fold in the cloth was distracting, but now it&#8217;s not clear what&#8217;s happening with the table in the foreground. Are we seeing the table edge? or an expanse of table cloth? The painting seems ambiguous here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>Great work! You did it!

PS - You can always sign it on the back if you want. Either way is totally acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work! You did it!</p>
<p>PS - You can always sign it on the back if you want. Either way is totally acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! It looks great! If you don't want to sign it on the front, you can always sign it on the &lt;i&gt;verso&lt;/i&gt;, which is a fancy word for back. It's completely acceptable to do either. Beautiful work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! It looks great! If you don&#8217;t want to sign it on the front, you can always sign it on the <i>verso</i>, which is a fancy word for back. It&#8217;s completely acceptable to do either. Beautiful work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! It looks great! If you don't want to sign it on the front, you can always sign it on the back, or &lt;i&gt;verso&lt;/i&gt; as they say. It's perfectly acceptable to do either. Beautiful work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! It looks great! If you don&#8217;t want to sign it on the front, you can always sign it on the back, or <i>verso</i> as they say. It&#8217;s perfectly acceptable to do either. Beautiful work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Conkey</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Conkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>This piece has a very reflective "north light" feel, it is very cool, well rendered, a nice subject, etc. I do wonder how it would look with a warm light hitting somewhere on the stem or top of the grapes, this would be enhanced by the majority of cool light. The effect would be dynamic and austere. I say this because when viewing your work as an artist, this is the thought that jumps to my mind; this would also obliterate any comments about the work being "cold". Your work has a "monumental" feel, attracting one's attention to gaze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piece has a very reflective &#8220;north light&#8221; feel, it is very cool, well rendered, a nice subject, etc. I do wonder how it would look with a warm light hitting somewhere on the stem or top of the grapes, this would be enhanced by the majority of cool light. The effect would be dynamic and austere. I say this because when viewing your work as an artist, this is the thought that jumps to my mind; this would also obliterate any comments about the work being &#8220;cold&#8221;. Your work has a &#8220;monumental&#8221; feel, attracting one&#8217;s attention to gaze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Jago</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/critique-me-3.html#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>Fixed.  Lovely.  Finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed.  Lovely.  Finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
