<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html</link>
	<description>a multi-disciplinary dialog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 00:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Birgit, no interpretation is too wierd for me. Besides I do yoga too (Iyengar). While I wasn't specifically thinking of chakra colors in choosing the backgrounds, that's certainly a valid observation. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Birgit, no interpretation is too wierd for me. Besides I do yoga too (Iyengar). While I wasn&#8217;t specifically thinking of chakra colors in choosing the backgrounds, that&#8217;s certainly a valid observation. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birgit</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>birgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 22:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-900</guid>
		<description>Digging in the dirt to transplant baby juniper for a future bird sanctuary, I realized that, above, I was wrong.  Red stands for the root (not the sacral) chakra that connect to the earth energies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digging in the dirt to transplant baby juniper for a future bird sanctuary, I realized that, above, I was wrong.  Red stands for the root (not the sacral) chakra that connect to the earth energies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birgit</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>birgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 21:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-899</guid>
		<description>Having taking Yoga for a few years now, some of the culture has rubbed off and I have learned about chakras. The blue backgrounds in the ‘influence’ picture, with the transposed beak, could speak for the throat chakra, said to be related to communication; the red background would refer to the sacral chakra,  related to creativity; and the beautiful yellow would signify the energy of the solar plexus. - I hope I am not too weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having taking Yoga for a few years now, some of the culture has rubbed off and I have learned about chakras. The blue backgrounds in the ‘influence’ picture, with the transposed beak, could speak for the throat chakra, said to be related to communication; the red background would refer to the sacral chakra,  related to creativity; and the beautiful yellow would signify the energy of the solar plexus. - I hope I am not too weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 18:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-886</guid>
		<description>Birgit, I think you are entirely correct. The other two paintings in the series show different relationships between human abd bird.

In this one, &lt;a href="http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/burdened.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Burdened&lt;/a&gt;, the bird is perhaps more dominant. And this one, &lt;a href="http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/influence.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Influence&lt;/a&gt;, shows another type of relationship.

Here are the URLs, in case my links don't work:
http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/burdened.html
http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/influence.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Birgit, I think you are entirely correct. The other two paintings in the series show different relationships between human abd bird.</p>
<p>In this one, <a href="http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/burdened.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.davidpalmerstudio.com');" rel="nofollow">Burdened</a>, the bird is perhaps more dominant. And this one, <a href="http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/influence.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.davidpalmerstudio.com');" rel="nofollow">Influence</a>, shows another type of relationship.</p>
<p>Here are the URLs, in case my links don&#8217;t work:<br />
<a href="http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/burdened.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.davidpalmerstudio.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/burdened.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/influence.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.davidpalmerstudio.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidpalmerstudio.com/American_Dreams/influence.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birgit</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>birgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 16:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-878</guid>
		<description>The raven and you have reached a compromise - coexistence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The raven and you have reached a compromise - coexistence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-853</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much. I'll probably do a few posts about other things first, but will be happy to write something more about my work at a later time. I don't like to focus on myself too much. There are a lot of other things out there to be explored :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much. I&#8217;ll probably do a few posts about other things first, but will be happy to write something more about my work at a later time. I don&#8217;t like to focus on myself too much. There are a lot of other things out there to be explored :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Crockett</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Crockett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2006/11/test.html#comment-852</guid>
		<description>Ah. I read your last comment with great pleasure, David. That's some good material &#8212; the basis for another post. I hope you're willing to repeat yourself a bit (and expand on it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. I read your last comment with great pleasure, David. That&#8217;s some good material &mdash; the basis for another post. I hope you&#8217;re willing to repeat yourself a bit (and expand on it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
