<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orientation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html</link>
	<description>a multi-disciplinary dialog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karl Zipser</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-19070</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Zipser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-19070</guid>
		<description>Orientation can have a radical effect on the way a picture looks. I sometimes find that a painting of a head or face looks better upside-down. At first I thought it was an effect of a novel view. Later I realized, or came to suspect at least, that it had to do with interpretations of gravity. What might seem heavy in the right-side up view would seem to float upward in the upside-down view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orientation can have a radical effect on the way a picture looks. I sometimes find that a painting of a head or face looks better upside-down. At first I thought it was an effect of a novel view. Later I realized, or came to suspect at least, that it had to do with interpretations of gravity. What might seem heavy in the right-side up view would seem to float upward in the upside-down view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Illingworth</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-18593</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Illingworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 17:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-18593</guid>
		<description>Steve
I use varied orientations to allow different brush stroke directions that create the colour and abstraction effects I try to achieve. It sometimes helps me to focus on the location of dark and light tones. It also helps me to work with the location and relationship of colours from different perspectives rather than being distracted by trying to get shapes right initally. Sometimes viewing the same image from a different perspective somehow helps me see if it all hangs together on the actual orientation of the picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve<br />
I use varied orientations to allow different brush stroke directions that create the colour and abstraction effects I try to achieve. It sometimes helps me to focus on the location of dark and light tones. It also helps me to work with the location and relationship of colours from different perspectives rather than being distracted by trying to get shapes right initally. Sometimes viewing the same image from a different perspective somehow helps me see if it all hangs together on the actual orientation of the picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Durbin</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-18588</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Durbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 16:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-18588</guid>
		<description>Mark,
I'm surprised to learn a painter also tries different orientations. Even though your paintings are quite abstract, there is still a lot of reference to real world objects, such as people, bicycles, etc. Do you look at different orientations to get a better sense of how to distribute color, or do you actually sometimes change the orientation from an earlier stage, before oriented referents are introduced?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
I&#8217;m surprised to learn a painter also tries different orientations. Even though your paintings are quite abstract, there is still a lot of reference to real world objects, such as people, bicycles, etc. Do you look at different orientations to get a better sense of how to distribute color, or do you actually sometimes change the orientation from an earlier stage, before oriented referents are introduced?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Illingworth</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-18580</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Illingworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-18580</guid>
		<description>It's catching!!! - I took a recent photo which is called Baking Tray Blues  - the colours and shapes on the underside of a wet baking tray had me jumping for the camera!

Maybe it's part of my continued development into the world of blue and it's effect on our inner being as a colour.

Anyway Steve (yes I'm back to comment after a spell in the studio!) I really appreciate what can happen during the orientation of a picture - I actually rotate my canvas many times when painting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s catching!!! - I took a recent photo which is called Baking Tray Blues  - the colours and shapes on the underside of a wet baking tray had me jumping for the camera!</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s part of my continued development into the world of blue and it&#8217;s effect on our inner being as a colour.</p>
<p>Anyway Steve (yes I&#8217;m back to comment after a spell in the studio!) I really appreciate what can happen during the orientation of a picture - I actually rotate my canvas many times when painting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Gangadharan</title>
		<link>http://artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-18460</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Gangadharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 14:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artandperception.com/2007/05/orientation.html#comment-18460</guid>
		<description>Steve,
Three years back I dragged my family to Dia:Beacon and remember being castigated for the meaninglessness of modern art by members of my family (the echoes of which reverberate even today). What I would not forget was the numerous times I was drawn to the John Chamberlain sculptures and myriad shapes that I saw in the twisted hunks of 'found automobile parts' that he created seemingly at random but had a unified beauty that I could not describe adequately. The picture of the rusted automobile just bought back that moment for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
Three years back I dragged my family to Dia:Beacon and remember being castigated for the meaninglessness of modern art by members of my family (the echoes of which reverberate even today). What I would not forget was the numerous times I was drawn to the John Chamberlain sculptures and myriad shapes that I saw in the twisted hunks of &#8216;found automobile parts&#8217; that he created seemingly at random but had a unified beauty that I could not describe adequately. The picture of the rusted automobile just bought back that moment for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
