This is an excerpt from something that looks like it will grow into a book, but right here, right now, I thought I would go directly to the heart of the subject.
I do not expect to win any popularity contests with this post. Truthfully, I am so far south of caring about that, I think new words would have to invented to describe my insouciance. As “posts” go, it is long, but I barely scratch the surface of the topic.
I can think of a great number of reasonable objections to what I say here. I doubt I’ve heard them all.
But let me say this. I know that for many people, doing art is not about money. Money is no true measure of success. Success is a multi-faceted jewel. Pride. Self fullfillment. Joy of creation. These are worthy. I honor anyone’s right to pursue their craft on their own terms. There are certain forms that are simply not economically viable. Artists who work in those form know that. They continue out of love, and truthfully, I love them for it.
But this post is about making money at art. It’s about making enough money at art to do only art.
Surviving as full time artist is a worthy ambition. I make no defense of that goal. It needs no justification. No explanation is required. None will be offered. It has always been my ambition to live through my art since the first synapses of my mind ever fired. I am by nature a type who must be self employed. Factually, by actual experience, I would rather die than fill out another job application.
I’ve made tons of money in other ways than art, however. I’ve made it doing things that made me sick to my soul, like pretending people needed college in order to be educated, only to see them betrayed by a market which had no place for their skills; rather, their lack therof. I am not a person who is impressed by degrees, rank, position, reputation, or money. I like money. I like the things money can buy. I like fast cars and motorcycles. I like vacations to the islands and long trips in yachts. I like to race horses on mountain paths. I like dining with crystal and dancing till dawn wearing seven thousand dollars worth of clothes, but money is not the measure of a man or a woman. I’d just as soon wear a t-shirt and blue jeans and dig in the dirt as sit in another gods forsaken boardroom and watch another boring brain fart of a Powerpoint presentation.
In this post, though I could not resist “insouciance” above, I have purposely kept the language simple. In fact, as I wrote, I kept in mind the vocabulary and attitude of a bright and rebellious teenager. This is stuff I wish I studied when I was sixteen instead of all the artsy fartsy theory I was discovering then.
How to Make a Living as an Artist
It’s not enough to be good. There are plenty of good artists. Robert De Niro is a good actor, right? Well, here’s a news flash. In just about every small town, in every just about little theater company, you will find actors just as good. Better.
Yeah, sure. You can disagree with the idea that talent is common, but when you do, understand that just about anyone will recognize your disagreement as a cover for your own fear.
Talent is common. Get used to it, and get over jealousy; it’ll kill you, and it’s really disgusting for everyone else.
You could say, “Oh Robert De Niro is not such a great actor, Fill_in_the_blank is a MUCH better actor than him.”
Fine. And you can still find thousand and thousands and thousands of actors no one has ever heard of who are just as good as Fill_in_the_blank.
Only no one has ever heard of them and no one will because they don’t know how to MARKET.
I swear, I think that if I hear ONE MORE TIME about how Van Gogh, that greaaaat artist died a complete unknown, I will spit.
Have you ever read any of Van Gogh’s biographies? Van Gogh was crazy. He was so weird, no one could even stand to be around him for more than a few hours. Aside from a few pitiful efforts to display his work, he really never exhibited. The few times that other artists would forcibly take his work from him and display it in group shows, he did, in fact sell. But nooo, crazy Van Gogh couldn’t have success. He sent all his paintings to his sweet stupid little dork of a brother who hid them in his attic.
No wonder Van Gogh never made a living. It wasn’t that the public didn’t understand his work. The public never even had the chance. Van Gogh never MARKETED.
So what is marketing? How do you do it? How do you sell good work? (And how do you sell bad work, for that matter?)
Most artists are free spirited, individualistic types, and they are often repelled by the piggy attitudes of merchant types. They see artists who are shameless self promoters and they think, “I’d rather starve than do that.”
And who likes pushy sales people? Ick.
Well, you don’t have to be one of those pushy sales people. You don’t have to be a shameless self promoter, and you don’t have to be a greedy pig.
But you do have to learn about marketing, and you do have to learn how to sell stuff, and you do have to learn about closing deals, and you do have to learn about collecting money.
It doesn’t matter whether you like those fun facts or not. You will either deal with them, or they will deal with you. Take your pick.
I didn’t invent this stuff. There are actually some really good texts on sales and marketing. If you study these books and articles while keeping art in mind, you will arrive at the same information. But of all the books I ever read, the very best one was written in 1952 by a guy who used to be a Madison Avenue advertising executive. It was called How to Make a Living as an Artist. This book has long since been out of print. I found it in a used book store. I loaned it to friend of mine who then suddenly died.
I never did get it back from her. I’m still irritated about that.
But since I did read the book over and over, and since I practiced what was in it, I remember all the essential things.
Except I can’t remember the author’s name, sorry.
What I learned there, when I was first studying marketing and selling is a good place to begin.
The Economics of Production
One day, after an expensive divorce in which the author basically lost everything, he decided he did not want to live in Manhattan any more, and he did not want to work in advertising. He wanted to be an artist. (One suspects that had something to do with his divorce.)
So he took what little money he had left — it wasn’t much, and he moved to Corpus Christi, Texas. That was a place where he’d taken vacations, and he had always loved it there. He rented a little cottage by the sea, and he took up painting, but unlike other painters, he knew how to market and how to sell, and he made a living.
The author had no illusions about being a great artist. He wanted to be free. He wanted to live his dream, and he did it. He started off by saying that so many artists have misconceptions about sales, marketing, and simple economics, that they never really give themselves a chance. And there he was with his rather ordinary, even amateurish seascapes, making a tidy little sum working no more than four hours a day.
So here’s the first thing you need to know about marketing.
The value of a thing is what the market will bear.
Sound simple, huh?
Nothing new, right?
Then why aren’t you making a living as an artist? Because if you understood that in your heart and not just your clever brain, and if your goal was to make a living as an artist, then you would be making a living at it.
Statistics talk, and clever talk? It walks. Maybe you can fool yourself, but you ain’t fooling me.
The value of thing is what the market will bear.
The buying public really does not care what you think the price of your work should be. Your opinion does not enter into the equation.
What you need to do is find out just how much money people are willing to pay for your work. You might not like the answers you’ll get, but you have to find out, and this is where you get to first practice sales without actually having to sell.
Start out with people near you. Encourage them to give you honest answers. Usually people are too kind. You don’t want that. You want honesty. You want the brutal truth.
There is one simple question you ask. “How much would you be willing to pay for this?”
Not, “What do you think this is worth?”
It’s just a waste of time to ask that.
There will be several discoveries you will make. First, you will get different numbers from different people. People who like avant garde work won’t pay very much money for traditional stuff; the reverse is true too. Second, the way you present your work will greatly affect the answers.
Never present a picture that should be in a frame unframed. I don’t even let my friends see unframed art. To get into my studio and see a work in progress, well, you had better be utterly beloved (and therefore know my rules about comments on unfinished pieces).
Always place the piece in the best possible light. At the very least make sure it is in a lovely room.
The very best situation is to create a special viewing area. Place the picture on a wall all by itself. Allow no distracting elements. You want to eliminate competition. Control the sound, the light, the mood. Create a calm environment. Be a gracious host. Offer seating and refreshments. Do not let the conversation idle. Chit chat about any old thing. At first, just practice on one person at a time. Later, you’ll get more confident and you’ll be able to handle groups.
A really fun thing I like to do when I have several pieces to show is rig a curtain in front of the display area. I will draw the curtain and change pictures then emerge and reveal the next piece with something of a flourish. If you have an accomplice, you can rig some lighting effects too.
Notice now. We are doing everything that sales people do without doing any selling. We are just surveying. We want to find out how much someone would be willing to pay. And the way you find out is you ask them point blank. You don’t have to ask them what they think. Just ask, “How much would you pay for a picture like this?”
Funny thing is, when you do this sort of thing, you bypass people’s social mechanisms. See, there they were all gearing up for your, “What do you think about this art?” And you just skipped ahead.
In person, in a gracious setting, you will not ordinarily get rude responses. You’ll get over any fear of that as you discover how basically nice people are. But really, create the space. Make the moment.
Most often people will stumble and hesitate. They will have a hard time. They will say, “I don’t know much about art” and things like that. So you’ll have to encourage them. You’ll need to say things like, “I’m not talking about art in general. I’m talking about YOU. C’mon! Five dollars? Five thousand?”
That last is a trick. You name two ridiculous figures. The person can then reject these. This puts them back in charge. By saying such wrong figures, you show that you really want a better assessment.
Your friends will tend to always quote you higher numbers.
But there’s another trick to handle that. As soon as they name a number, you say, “Good. How do you want to pay for that? Check? Cash?”
“Er… well.. Uh…”
“Uh huh. So you wouldn’t actually pay that much. How much then?”
But once they name a number, ask for the money. That’s the acid test. You have to ask for the money. You’ll never get it if you don’t. Yeah. A cruel trick to play on your friends? Bullshit. If they say they like your art, but they don’t buy it, trade goods or favors for it, help you sell it, or help you work in all the many ways help can come, they’re not your friends.
Friends help each other to survive, and by survive I mean survive in the original Latin sense, to not merely live, but live better.
But the first big, broad action you have to do is find out how much people are willing to pay for your work. Once you’ve surveyed, Oh, not that many people, fifty, a hundred, you’ll start seeing the patterns. You’ll see how education, socio-economic status, cultural background, and such come into play. You’ll start seeing what kind of people really like your work, and you’ll have a pretty good idea how much they will actually pay.
There are several ways you can go, now.
First, you can make your work better. You can start getting better answers to the question, “How much are you willing to pay?”
Second, you can find ways to increase production. Practice. Refinement of technique, the development of themes which don’t involve you in a creative struggle every time you face a blank canvas. Practice. You can try new forms, new techniques, get better tools. Practice.
Did I say practice?
Oh yes. I see I did.
But practice.
Third, you can find ways to cut expenses. Ditch the whole Middle Class thing of trying to keep up appearances. Move. Your neighbors are just jealous twits and rich people are not impressed by your condo. Drive a used car. Shop at stores that sell factory seconds. Buy bulk wholesale. Buy your art supplies from a mail order house, not the nice store in town.
You might start to get in range then.
Get better prices by getting better. Increase production. Cut expenses. Put your money into things that help you make art. Avoid all other expenses. Invest only in your own production.
The brutal truth will not change, and the truth is: if you cannot live off the prices people will pay for what you can produce, you will not live off of your art.
You might find you can realisticly expect to make a hundred dollars a week off your art. Not good. But that’s how I started out. It got better. It got ten times better in five years. But I never would have made it without starting. True, I had a nice mutual fund portfolio, several IRAs, and a few pieces of real estate. Except for one house, I’d lost it all before I broke through. I made every possible mistake. I ran the gamut of forms and techniques. I bridged a dozen different markets before the niches I liked started to pay decently.
And I’d do it all again.
Read artist’s biographies. You will see again and again that the artists who make it are fantastically productive people.
That is our great weapon. Production. Most people are basically lazy. They do what they have to in order to get by. They try and create as much free time for fun as they can, and they throw all their extra money into sensory gratification. That’s a trap.
To escape, produce enough so that it doesn’t matter if you get low prices.
That is the secret.
Sure. Easier said than done. Hello? That is not news. We’ve been hearing how hard it is forever. Yawn. Next topic? Please?
Artist always fret over displaying and exhibiting. The buying public does not give crapola about your exhibition list. It’s usually only other artists or dealers who will ask you. Failing in the market, they’ve come up with a Brownie Point system. Don’t buy into their silly games. The easy part is finding people and places willing to display your work. The hard part is being personally productive enough to live off what the market will bear.
Next section, The Easy Part: How to find Places to Exhibit or Drawing Attention: Taking Your Case to the People.
Is this the book? (written in 1998?)
http://www.amazon.com/How-make-living-as-artist/dp/B0006RXRGQ/sr=8-2/qid=1163254868/ref=sr_1_2/104-4251552-3286319?ie=UTF8&s=books
Rex, Damn! I’m with you 100%. I could not have stated the truth of how I feel any better; put my name next to yours on this post. Cheers
Rex, I must have read this post five times, you have put so much down it is practically a “method”. You have certainly jogged loose some thinking in my brain. Living way up here in an isolated wilderness makes selling art probably the hardest of all, moving to a city would be a guaranteed success for my art. I do not want to move however, so I still deal with issues that folks who live in towns and cities don’t deal with, (isolation). I am literally building my “art career” up from the ground “bare bones”. I have figured out my pricing, and feel fortunate that I have sold what I have in my circumstances,(strickly internet sales). Finding galleries is where I am at now, it is not as easy as it seems in an “art state” finding “good” representation,(Santa Fe is only a “blue chip” artists haven, one needs a national name to be represented there by a fine gallery). I’m will look into Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Arizona, etc. Finding galleries that are professional, and instill a confidence in myself, is equally important to them liking my work. I would never go into a “coop” or “hodge-podge” situation. I need real marketing and real professional representation. I can offer a gallery a lot with my experience, I am looking for a relationship with a gallery. “Never cast your pearls before swine”, “good things come to those who wait”. Getting out there and going door to door is hard work though.
I like dining with crystal and dancing till dawn wearing seven thousand dollars worth of clothes
When you can paint in those $7,000 clothes, that’s when you’ve really made it :)
Good post, Rex. I agree with you about most of it. Here are a couple of other good books on marketing:
How to Survive and Prosper as an Artist, byy Caroll Michels
Selling the Invisible, by Harry Beckwith
Lisa,
That’s not the book. I’ve seen it at one of the Big Tent bookstores. It’s another one of those business plan, contract, representation, dealing with galleries, working within the system books.
There’s another book with the same title published too. Every so often, I do a search for the one I’m talking about. It had all these funky post WWII magazine style illustrations. It’s about 50,000 words. A big little book.
David,
I read the first. I found it in a library. I found myself flipping pages impatiently to get past psychological analysis about overcoming creative and carreer blocks. That book was not written for me, but it was written for some people. I’ve always been a take no prisoners, ferociously ambitious type.
The second book looks super interesting though. I read some of the excerpts. I’m ordering it, and thanks.
Rex, I agree. The first book has a little more hand-holding than I’d want, but there is some useful information in it. Selling the Invisible, on the other hand, is a really excellent marketing book, even if not specifically geared toward artists.
Jon,
Unfortunately, I’ve used up the little time I had and have to get back to work, so I can’t respond as I would like, but let me ask this though, where do you live?
Fascinating post, Rex. I’m looking forward to the next section.
Rex, I’m up in the Sangre de Cristos mountains, about 50 miles east of Taos, and 40 miles north of Las Vegas NM (not Nevada) near Mora, NM. Santa Fe is 1.5 hours away around the mountain range.
Jon, I don’t know much about the galleries there, but there are some really major artists in your area. Bruce Nauman and Susan Rothenberg both live in Taos. Terry Allen is somewhere else nearby (Galisteo?), as is the art critic Lucy Lippard who moved there a few years ago from NYC. Have you had a chance to meet any of them? I know you’re up in the mountains, but you have a mini-NY art scene just around the corner.
Jon, Ah. I know this area well. I looked at cabins there once upon a time, and I’ve travelled many times to the area. You live in one of my favorite places in the US. As David points out, you have a hot art scene there. In an article I read in the nineties, it was stated that Santa Fe has the highest number of galleries per capita of any city in the country.
I believe it. I have walked and browsed every shop on gallery row many times
Yes, I know they say they want “blue chip” artists, but the translation is “artists who are proven sellers and producers and who furthermore will require little promotion because they have a following.”
In my next article, I talk a lot about that. But to jump ahead, you can become a proven seller by using your friend’s houses as galleries. Since you can work SOOO fast, you can get into craft fairs and street shows and be viable. Truly, gallery owners have dollar signs in their eyes.
If you can say, “Well, I’m doing about two or three (or five, or seven) hundred a week just selling out of my studio through personal contacts…”
You will get hung. But you have to do your own legwork. Dealers get Karma by “discovering” new talent, but the kind of talent they love is an artist who works his ass off, knows how to sell, and does.
I will end up repeating myself, but your questions are important, so here you are. It is certainly not necessary to move to a city. I’ve made a specialization of living in wild places. No, you don’t make as much money in the small, local scenes, but you don’t need to. Additionally, big cities are soul draining for some of us. I am invigorated by wild places and ananesthetized by urban environments. I like to vist, but I don’t like living there because it kills my art. Where I live, on Whidbey Island, Washington, there are several hundred full time artists that I know of. Few of them sell locally, a lot sell in Seattle, Olympia, and Tacoma. None have have the best reputation for good prices, but Miami, interestingly enough, does, particulary for fantasy and New Age art.
You can live where you want and sell where you want. The two are not closely related.
I also make the case for doing without galleries. I’m biased that way, truth to tell. You do go to the heart of the matter when you say, “good representation.” I got that.
No one will ever better represent your work better than you. You can take out a loan of that future.
Rex,
I find your long text strangely un-provocative. I feel that I agree with much of what you say. This makes me highly suspicious. I will read it again and think some more. It can’t be as easy as you make it sound.
Angela’s post in particular raises some issues you don’t cover.
Karl,
…..or it could just be that Rex is right.
I haven’t contributed to this thread because a) I don’t have much to add, and b) I’d rather go fishing. Rex will understand what this means.
Karl,
I find it strange that “provocative” is a criterion that must necessarily be applied to a post. This time, I did not write in a way designed to stimulate a lot of comments. It was an article. It was different, and factually, you all got introduced to me for the first time, really.
When I put up similar thoughts on rec.arts.fine, I always get flamed. These thoughts really bring the losers out. A & P is not a loser hangout. Colin, indicated what was probably a common reaction.
I repeat, it is better to be useful than to be cool. Sometimes it is useful to put up interesting reading and not try and stir stuff up. I grow tired of that sort of thing myself.
And easy to understand is not necessarily easy to do.
But if you want provocative? Heh. >:D
David and Rex, I appreciate you both taking the time and offering some insights for me in my area. If I made $700. a week, I wouldn’t need a gallery (I could live very well on that). In the Mora Valley there is no art market (too poor, and there is no interest), there isn’t one in Las Vegas, NM either (too few art patrons); these societies are “too green” for fine art at the moment (but good places for artists to move).
Taos may well be my ticket. They are under going a big developement boom in the retail sector (new shopping plazas), on top of all the new homes they have built. The area is gaining outside competition, this will do away with much of the cronyism going on in these areas,(outside art styles coming in, and “native american art” learning to deal with it). Since the rest of the country “thinks” it is a “hot art area”, this will help turn it into a “real art market” for those who live here as well,(like what happened in Laguna Beach). I moved here because I too thought New Mexico was a great art mecca; in some ways it is, beauty, peace, free types, open space, talent, etc. But in other ways, it is an illusion of “grandeur”.
There is much bad art in many fine galleries in New Mexico, bad art by “nationally known” artists. Art that sells because others are buying it or it looks good over the couch, therefore it must be good. So we know bad art sells, I imagine they have built these artists up to be near “godlike” in their talents (to atone for the thousands they can get for canvas, wood, and some oil). I am an artist who is looking for someone to buy my art because they like the art, not because they will get rich from collecting my art. If those who collect my work recognize my work as being good enough to stand behind and purchase, this will indeed help me become a known artist. To me, how I gain my success is more important than the success itself. I want smart, educated, cultured, talented, travelled, loving people who make decisions for themselves to propel my success; if these types choose my work, that is a reward in itself.
Jon,
Please forgive me for saying this, but I see in your comment how you are shooting yourself in the foot.
Your assumption that poor people have no taste and can’t or won’t by art is patently false. Going after the “beautiful people” is a chimera. Ordinary working people are as good as any kind of people anywhere. Kind, brave, loyal, honest, and best of all, an appreciation for craft or skill because that is how they live. Many can easily afford to buy a two or three or five hunderd hundred dollar painting, and remember, usually they have CASH, not credit cards.
Have some more faith in regular folks. You see, if you go after that market, the world opens. You have little competition and a vast group rather than the other way around.
That is how rich people get rich.
Jon,
Northern New Mexico is my favorite place in the US (I grew up in Los Alamos). I suspect I will move back once my kids are gone. I love the landscape and it just feels like home – and that inspiration is more important to me than a handy market right down the road.
Have you been up to La Veta, CO? While also an economically depressed area (what isn’t in NM and southern CO?), I hear there have been a few artists that have moved in. Ricky Timms a quilter that is well known in the traditional quilt world, opened a quilt gallery down there a year ago. Some people I know were looking at land down there to retire and in the year since they started looking prices have doubled. I doubt there is much going on right now but it’s a place I’m watching (I’m about 2 1/2 hours from La Veta – in the south burbs of Denver).
Have you checked out the art scene in Los Alamos? There is a lot of money in that town, and a lot of smart people. Maybe make a few mushroom cloud paintings to attract their attention. :) I can’t recall much art around town growing up other than native american art.
And for just pure fun (but it is also amazingly beautiful) have you been over to Echo Amphitheater – north of Abiquiu up near Ghost Ranch? http://www.vivanewmexico.com/ghosts/echo.html
Rex, Your point is very well taken, “I do not want to untie the shoe I am tying”.
Lisa, Los Alamos is a fine place to live and work, A friend Ned Bittinger is near there, one has access to everything in New Mexico.
I was thinking about this post today while I was working on the A&P site.
My father has a very nice collection of Native American art that he largely bought from the support staff for the labs (ie cleaning crew). Los Alamos is an expensive town to live in so much of the support staff (ie lower paid employees) live in the valley below.
[Yes Los Alamos is a fine place to live and work but it is also a fairly unique, and maybe not quite “real”, place also. When I was in high school Time magazine did an article that describe us all as ‘white rich and prejudice’. I’m not sure how far off the mark they were. I left 25 years ago so a lot has probably changed, but when I go back it sure looks the same.]
But to my point – these folks used the sales techniques that Rex described in this post. They would come into town with the back end of their trucks loaded down with art work (their own and their relatives and friends) and sell it to the scientists in the parking lot and in their offices.
This was an excellant and informative article… Thank you.
Wolfbaby,
You are welcome, and thank you.
Am rereading an old book “How to Make a Living as a Painter”. Googled the author out of curiosity. Ran into your discussion. Curious if you live totally on the proceeds from your art? If so, would love to hear details.
Our family has lived off our pottery artwork for 30+ years, raised three kids. Many perks, but often difficult financially. Now would also like to paint for a living…
boni,
Hopefully Rex will notice your comment here, but meanwhile, his most recent post relates to his artistry as a chef.
I just ran across this post and comments. My grandfather wrote this book. I too am reading it and learning from it. I encourage others to read it.
It is:
“How to Make a Living as a Painter” by Kenneth Harris
It is out of print but Amazon has several copies for sale
Frieda,
I found and enjoyed the book myself, and likewise recommend it. How fun to have a family connection to it!
wow! although many good points are made in this “article”, it repels me. not only the arrogance, undue confidence and manipulative nature of it but its relentlessness. the way that one person (karl zipser) responded with something which only suggested disagreement and that they would think about it, and then quickly came the “counter argument” from the author to attempt to further sway the person thinking about it. i can tell you have studied marketing because of the manipulative nature of your writing. it disturbs me that the way this is written feels so full of spin. it seems that you are nothing more than a local artist who is not only selling his art. to say that van gogh was weird or mad, like this was a bad thing, shows not only your lack of empathy but your dismissiveness towards real (weird) different, creative people. so van gogh wasnt intersted in marketing, so what, its fucking boring and if he hadnt suffered his art would not have been so good. so youre comfortable, youre making art full time by selling it to consumers, great. commercial art is awful, if it sells to the everyday joe it only reflects the products they already buy, the capitalist crap they already believe. artists are supposed to suffer and be shunned. to be able to make art and have a bourgeoise, boring, comfortable existence breeding is a contradiction. it disgusts me that you would endorse spending $7000 on an outfit…this only confirms that not only are you a money driven materialist with no idea of the value of money but someone who is without any artistic integrity who belives that material things actually mean something. you argue like a neo-nazi, you echo the consumer morons you attempt to fool into buying your “art”. so youre making money from doing something you “love”? thats fine…but its the arrogance, preachy self righeousness and greedy materialism which leads me to believe that your art is nothing more than the kind of thing people buy because a) it matches their sofa and b) it conveys ideas which are either exceedingly simple/obvious or completely contrived/sentimental for it to be commercially viable.
pops
pops,
With your statement, “artists are supposed to suffer and be shunned,” you certainly put yourself at the opposite end of the spectrum from Rex, who was being deliberately provocative–not that he’d disavow anything, I imagine. Most artists are somewhere in between.
A blunt comment by critic Peter Schjeldahl in an interview by Deborah Solomon (Artforum, Summer 2008) seems to bear on this:
i feel as though I’m addressing my deceased grandfather, known to friends and family as Pop.
Many of us, and I included, live in that gray smudge of a middle ground where everything is seen as having its virtues. From this vantage point a person who retires alone to that room mentioned above, therein to craft his or her own personal navel to contemplate shares a common validity with a person who can successfully exchange that navel for a suit of clothes.
Back to my ‘drawing neigh’ position where I argue that the degree and quality of virtue and aesthetics has to do with how close we are to a realm of existence that some might term ‘spiritual’ and others ‘extra-dimensional’. I would further argue that our every thought and action can be seen in this light. Granted such a thing, and carrying the supposition further, it might then be said that every thought and action has some aesthetic potential. Then, to the extent that art and aesthetics overlap each other, we might say that everyone is an artist to some degree. How very seventies of me! How very Picasso. My point in this is that the pursuit of quality more defines an ‘artist’ than does any lifestyle choice. And people like Dali and Benvenuto Cellini – and Rex – spice things up.
Hey this is really a good article , ThankYou REX , and yeah , always thought that the world outside is harsh , it is and i always worried about how to face it cuz i was darn afraid , I’m graduating from and Art college soon and have to go to work , ran across your Article , REX , and thought i should be more productive on my stuffs ! Might as well pick up some marketing class , I’m not that afraid as before now , after reading your post , still a little somehow , but hey thanks ! Great wake up call !
Thank you for your article! It was exactly what I needed to hear at the right moment. I do stained glass mosaics which a mural can at times take up 3 mths. to finish. I set up my schedule so that I work on my glass during the day and do the artist/bartending thing at night. Over the years I thought that I wasn ‘t getting any where. But now that I finally have inventory because of the financial sacrifices that I have made to be productive I am starting to sell. The used car,less dinners out, all were worth the working paid artist status. Thank you for reaffirming to keep it up and it will be yours
I dont think about money bcos i m already selfemployed in retail shop, and i earn enough to support me and my family. But i have lots of free time. I sketch and paint bcos i m in love with creating something so wonderful and creative. I cant stop myself from painting; even when my elbow was extremely swollen, i was painting even if it hurt. I love painting to the point of madness. I have enough money to go by, and i m not obsessed with money. I dont want goodies money can provide. I only want people to appreciate my work. I dream of my paintings auctioning for millions; but not bcos i want those millions, but that will be the real appreciation of my work. I want people to see the real me through my work my paintings. Money is secondary you r not going to take it up with you. Basic necessities are required but thats about it.
Main thing is that I want to live forever through my art.
Bhavesh,
It is an interesting idea to become immortal through one’s works of art. While only a few artists are remembered by their names, many of us contribute to a continuum of culture and thereby help to shape humanity.
I am contemporary artist /painter from Nepal. I am working on Human mind and sences since 1992. Since then I have been enventing different aspects of human thinking process. It is very urgent to show to the right professional
place and create and sell to the right people and orgranation. Now this human thinking process is going towards 100% mind invention. I have been inventing but not getting the right place and people to deal with it. Now I got your contact in the web. Please help me
Shobha,
http://www.artandperception.com it a blog that allows artists to communicate and learn from one another. To tell other artists about what you do, you want to make a website with digital images of your artworks. Then, when you put in a comment as you did here, you can enter the url of your website and everyone can click on your name as a link to your website and see your work of art.
Birgit and Shobha:
I wonder what the Internet looks like in Nepal. I assume that what we might discuss as possibilities, such as website urls and the like, makes sense and can be acted upon in that country. Is that so?
This made me cry!! I love you!!
I just ordered this book from Amazon for 78 cents. Looking forward to reading it.
How to Make a Living As a Painter (Hardcover)
by Kenneth Harris
Rex, Thanks for your comments, dated Nov.11, 2006. I was doing research on Kenneth Harris author “How to Make a Living as a Painter.” I read the book in geology lab in 1963. I still have the book. I am writing a memoir titled: ” I was told: You Can’t Make a Living as an Artist.” Three weeks ago I had a celebration of my 40 years as a professional fine artist making a full time living from only my art work.
For the record I left Abilene,Texas when I was 18 driving a 49 Chrysler and all the money I had in the world was $250. I also read Napoleon Hill’s book “Think and Grow Rich” That my dad gave me, told me to study it, learn the secrets and apply them to my life, I did what I was told. I have worked strongly all my life and at 75 I am still working and my passion to make and sell art will never die. Thanks for listing . I am now going to look up your art work. My web page is artwarren.com. I would enjoy hearing from you. Warren Cullar
I enjoyed reading the comments. I think artists need spend more time promoting their art anyway possible (better inexpensive way) to get a word out. Just painting in the studio is not enough. It is better to paint what you like and find the audience that likes what you paint. Financial rewards are not the only rewards you get in this short life. If you can find more time painting,when you do not have to do other work to make ends meet, is GOLD! You do not need a lot of money to be happy. I like to paint using oils, and I paint clouds and stars, because they represent freedom and beautiful infinite life energy that never dies. Check out my work: http://www.saatchiart.com/arturpashkov