Posted by Leslie Holt on January 5th, 2007
I used to hate artists who refer to art historical images, whether through appropriation or more subtle reference. It struck me as elitist and dull. Why don’t they make their own images? And aren’t they attracting a really limited audience? But now I myself have started a new series with the aforementioned dreaded art historical references, and I am fascinated with other artists who do it.
Yasumasa Morimura is a Japanese artist who recreates scenes from famous paintings and inserts himself in the “protagonist” position. His end products are photos in which he pretty faithfully reproduced the painting, but with himself in it, often as a woman.
more… »
Filed in Uncategorized
- Comments closed
Posted by Karl Zipser on January 4th, 2007
Is children’s art “art”? Steve said that age does not matter; Derek, June, Bob and Arthur were ambivalent. I thought I should ask a Françesca (four and a half years old) for her opinion about what she makes, and also about work by “grownups.”
more… »
Filed in children,drawing,from imagination
- Comments closed
Posted by Bob Martin on January 4th, 2007
For some of us, resolving a painting is more difficult then it should be. Once started, I am not able to see what I am doing with a clean mind. There are elements that I fall in love with a try to work around them, but never seem to get the entire painting to work. Recently I discovered that a painting that was testing my identity as an artist (another way saying, gave me great doubts about my ability) only needed for my scrape out the one thing that I thought was working for me, in order for the the rest of the painting to come alive.
Occasionally or almost always, the paintings become overworked. Knowing when to stop is a good thing. I have tried all of the little tricks you can use to play with your mind, like hiding the painting in a closet for a week, the black mirror, turning it upside down etc. Anybody have any other ideas?
Filed in art education,being an artist,from imagination
- Comments closed
Posted by Arthur Whitman on January 3rd, 2007
Looking Down
Nesting Instinct
From my latest review:
Taking a look around “Garden: Delights and Detritus” – a show of artist’s books, drawings and mixed-media prints by Ithaca College professor Susan Weisand – one is immediately struck by their visual eclecticism. Weisand’s work uses a wide spectrum of techniques and materials, typically combining several to create a single image. Similarly, she arranges, layers and re-uses different motifs and styles in a collage-like manner, giving her seemingly timeless natural subjects a distinctly contemporary feel.
More here.
I would appreciate any feedback on my artwriting.
Filed in Uncategorized
- Comments closed
Posted by Steve Durbin on January 2nd, 2007
On the last day of 2006 I made several pictures of grasses in the snow. They were in a field near the woods I’ve been frequenting for my series of Sourdough Trail photographs. Although that series is concerned with complexity, at least in part, the grasses were classic studies in simplicity.
I feel that I am as much drawn to minimal subjects as complex ones — certainly when it comes to photographs I would like to own — but few of my own images are minimalist ones. Is it possible to encompass both complex and simple images within a single, coherent style? Or do they represent ways of looking at the world that are too different? If you saw both kinds of images in the same show, would you sense that the artist did not have a “mature vision”? Do you work in different “styles” at the same time?
Filed in across the arts,technique
- Comments closed
Posted by Karl Zipser on January 1st, 2007
Painting
From Life vs.
From Photos
Thanks to my New Years resolutions, I took my camera on my walk this morning. Making photos every day — what’s the big deal? Photography is just a matter of pressing a button, right?
I did the same walk around the harbor that I do every day when I am in Wilhelmshaven. But today I felt exhausted afterwards, and it wasn’t from the physical weight of the camera. I felt tired because I used my out-of-shape “photographic vision,” a special way of looking at the world through a camera. It took about half an hour of walking and shooting to get into “photographic vision,” and it now persists for some time after I put down the camera. “Photographic vision” lets me take photographs without using a camera, in a sense. I assume all the photographers have this; probably the professionals live with it all the time. For an amateur like me, it yields a sort of “mental muscle ache,” something like what you feel when you first start exercising muscles that you didn’t realize you had. All the more reason for the daily workout!
Filed in being an artist,photography
- Comments closed
Posted by Karl Zipser on January 1st, 2007
Filed in Uncategorized
- Comments closed